Assessment

Understanding sensory processing starts with assessment: systematically observing how someone responds to different types of input across different senses and settings. This section covers the formal instruments and practical methods.

Formal assessment instruments

Dunn Sensory Profiles — the most widely used globally. Based on Dunn’s four-type framework (neurological threshold × behavioural response). Multiple forms from infancy to adulthood. No validated Dutch version.

Sensory Processing Measure — grounded in Ayres’ sensory integration theory. Multi-informant, cross-setting design. Covers infancy to adulthood. Includes praxis and social participation.

Sensory Experiences Questionnaire — designed specifically for autism. Distinguishes social from nonsocial sensory contexts. Research instrument, ages 2–12.

MAIA — Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness — the only multidimensional self-report interoception measure. Eight dimensions. Adult self-report only.

Practical assessment methods

Building an individual prikkelprofiel — a six-step collaborative method for mapping sensory profile across all eight senses, developed through the SGL project.

Prikkeltaal — stimulus language — the vocabulary framework that makes sensory assessment possible. You can’t assess what you can’t name.

The framework

Dunn’s four types of sensory processing — the theoretical model (Observer, Seeker, Sensor, Avoider) that most assessment instruments are built on or relate to.

Gaps

Dutch validation evidence gap — no formally validated Dutch versions of the major instruments exist. This is a critical barrier for Dutch practice.

Sensory processing intervention predictor gap — no research links sensory profiles to intervention response. We can describe the profile but not predict what will help.